At this location, the VNWA is a bit squirly near the BC band but with a
single L/C notch added at the device input (within the cal plane), it
works fine.
The AA-55 Zoom I have is immune and is the my go-to instrument for field
work. Recommended.
MFJ-259 is too easily disturbed and is not reliable with any antenna of
larger physical size.
5KW BC station about 5 miles east of here.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com
On 12-Oct-18 3:35 PM, Wes Stewart wrote:
I can vouch for the AA-55 Zoom, although it is not without flaws. I
live 5.9 miles from a 50KW BC station on 1550 kHz. On my 160-meter
inverted-L they are 70 dB over S9 on a calibrated K3, that's 70 dB
above -73 dBm or -3dBm. As long as I don't sweep through that
frequency, the analyzer is unfazed. As an aside, I have yet to find a
low cost SDR that will stand up to this. I had to return a RSP2 Pro
that even with BC band filtering folded up like a cheap suitcase.
My N2PK VNA works fine as does the DG8SAQ VNWA. I just last night
finished building a DG5MK designed FA-VA5, which I suspect will do
okay. It will run using the VNWA software too. Good thing, since so
far, the standalone interface is wanting, but that could be my
failing. (It's really tough to run an instrument this powerful with
just three push buttons)
Note that all of these are vector analyzers.
Wes N7WS
On 10/12/2018 12:20 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
On 10/12/2018 12:02 PM, AC0RL via Topband wrote:
I have found that antenna analyzers can get screwed up on long
antennas if
there are nearby transmitters; AM stations or any other transmitter
that can
swamp out the input to the analyzer. I live 1/4 mile from a 1kw am
station
and I cannot use any brand of analyzer on the HF bands. I must use a
SWR
bridge and a transmitter.
Jerry Kahn
AC0RL
Don't lose hope!
I live 6 miles from a 50 kW BCB station. Most analyzers are useless.
Then I bought the Rig Expert AA-55 zoom. All I can say is: it works
flawlessly at this QTH on a 90 foot top loaded vertical. Also, the
AA-55 can be protected with a BCB reject filter, which can then be
calibrated out. If you play that card, I'm sure you will be OK even
at your high QRM QTH.
You can also use an N8LP digital wattmeter which reads out impedance,
not just SWR. Larry tells me that you have to locate the device's
coupler at the antenna (not in the shack) and the cables between
the coupler and main box cannot exceed 20 feet. With those caveats,
this is a bulletproof way to make R + jX measurements.
A poor man's retro solution is to build a noise bridge for 160 meters.
AFAIK, no commercially made bridge works on topband. You can take
a published design for the higher bands and just extrapolate it to
160, by replacing the variable capacitor with a triple 365 pF broadcast
receiver unit. You might have to increase the amount of ferrite
in the bridge transformer.
Rick N6RK
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|