| To: | Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 160m Antenna, worse than I thought ! |
| From: | Mike DeChristopher <mfdechristopher@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:15:47 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Similar problem here in October. The inverted-L snapped just past the bend ~90ft up but miraculously did not slip back thru the insulator. Only realized what had happened when I noticed wire tangled in the thatcher when I dragged the lawn! The tune was off, but I still worked across the pond several nights with the "shorty 160." Mike N1TA On Mon, Nov 26, 2018, 3:27 PM Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca wrote: > de Mike VE9AA > > > > > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX everywhere - the facts, Guy Olinger K2AV |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Vertical antennas aren't always best for DX, John Kaufmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160m Antenna, worse than I thought !, Guy Olinger K2AV |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |