| To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 2 channel SDR, Linrad, comparison of SNR of two antennas |
| From: | P H via Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | P H <sp2bpd@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:40:05 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
to those who watched this video: https://youtu.be/UzP03mZVLvE can you help me in my search to resolve the puzzle: why is reception on 160 meters so much different compared to the other bands??? Flag antenna pattern is very much similar 1.8 up to 14 MHz (and even higher) is the vertical polarization of the Flag sufficient explanation for the mediocre performance above 1.8 MHz??? Regards Piotr, SP2BPD _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Subject: Re: elevated radial Message-ID:, Kenny Silverman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data), Todd Goins |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: 2 channel SDR, Linrad, comparison of SNR of two antennas, P H via Topband |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: 30 Ja's worked today on 160, Herbert Schoenbohm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |