Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data)

["Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>]

>So, now we're (apparently) recommending he cut back his already minimal
radial field..uhhh, really Wes?

I agree with Wes' assessment -- as well as him questioning why Rr would
increase with an increased number of radials.  If Rr is changing
significantly with the increase, then something else is perturbing the
measurement.  

Wes cut his radial length to match the vertical L section height (see N6LF
reference).  He didn't reduce the number of radials.  

Paul, W9AC 

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector