Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: JA's came in droves today on 160

To: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>, "'Herbert Schoenbohm'" <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: JA's came in droves today on 160
From: "Edward Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:39:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Jay.  The IP address is actually tied to your device and is picked up and 
identified on the internet.  My point was that the machine deserves the credit 
for the DXCC.  That’s all.

 

I would totally agree with you that if all this was about was RTTY morphing to 
FT8 then its not very different.  However, FT8 is pulling on other modes 
clearly based on this dialog.

 

At the end of the day, some people care whether they are part of the action, 
and some people don’t.  Those of us that do seem to have a pretty universal 
distaste for FT-8.

 

73

 

Ed  N1UR

 

From: JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET [mailto:JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET] 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 2:35 PM
To: Edward Sawyer; 'Herbert Schoenbohm'
Cc: 'TopBand List'
Subject: Re: Topband: JA's came in droves today on 160

 

Ed – the “IP address” and the internet have nothing to do with the FT8 mode 
other than that’s how you initially download the WSJT-X program...so why is the 
transition from RTTY to FT8 any different than the transition from AM to SSB 
again ?

                                  jay ny2ny

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>