Wes
You want to say that such a tricky way (presenting a fake card without
an application) should go unpunished?
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Wes писал 2020-03-23 19:35:
Based upon the supplied communications, it's unclear to me whether
there was an actual application made along with the submitted card or
not. Jarda claims not, but based on the disqualification, if it
followed its own rules, ARRL must have received one because...
The DXCC AWARD APPLICATION form states, "Required With Each New
Submission and Endorsements"
If the "required" application/fees and affirmed signature weren't
submitted, then he did not make an application and whether or not the
card is bogus should not matter.
So there should be one of two outcomes:
1) He submitted a signed application affirming that he followed all
of the rules, but submitted a bogus card. His removal is justified.
2) He did not submit a signed application but only asked for an
opinion about the card. He should be reinstated.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Wes N7WS
On 3/23/2020 8:27 AM, K9FD wrote:
Well let me be the 2nd then to comment,
Its clear as friggin day, guy sent in a doctored card, pasted a
printer label
over the top of a QSO for another band, ARRL saw it in person and
said
"Fake" card, and disqualified him
His gripe is he was just sending it to "test" them to check it out,
didnt really
mean to submit it,
If they would have just passed it through and given credit, do you
think he
would have said one word.
No translation needed, simple easy logic. Attitude or tone BS,
Facts are facts.
Merv K9FD
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|