Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire.
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:08:37 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
N6LF Rudy's web site and associated QEX series has empirical data to answer all of these questions regarding the number and length of on ground radials.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


On 12/10/20 11:14 AM, Mark - N5OT wrote:
Yeah.  I don't claim to be a radial expert but I do claim to have a lot of experience working other stations on 160 meters.
My buddy W9RE told me on a DXpedition once that he built a dipole 
laying on the ground and it resonated on 160 when the wires were about 
80 feet long.
Ray, with respect (N6VR and I go back a LOOOONG way), I think 80 feet 
is the "new quarter wave radial" on 160, and frankly the only thing I 
really think I understand about verticals is, the more wire on the 
ground, the better, but you can get to a point where adding more is 
not worth the effort, YMMV etc.
My story for the week is:  I put up yet another temporary 160 vertical 
for the ARRL 160 last weekend, and only managed 14 radials before it 
got so dark I thought I better be getting on the air.
I worked 970 QSOs that night, including 5 Europeans, and while I was 
out there on Saturday adding more radials, I got a text from K5ZD 
saying I was an alligator, that I was very loud the night before, but 
couldn't hear him calling me for 10 minutes as he needed Oklahoma.
So I stopped adding radials, I was up to 22 radials at 80' long, and 
moved on to listening antennas.
Worked maybe 10 Europeans and counted 10 JAs, so I know my signal was 
getting to those places.
That's really all I know about that.

The vertical is 50 feet tall and has two symmetrical top-load wires that bring the resonant frequency to 1.8 MHz.
73 - Mark N5OT

P.S. Got an email from a guy in South Dakota who worked 376 QSOs (including 4 other countries) using an inverted L that was 20 feet up and the rest horizontal, fed against 20 radials 25' long in his yard.  I love stories like that.

On 12/10/2020 9:52 AM, Wes wrote:
IMHO, for that number, on-the-ground radials do not need to be anywhere near that long.  Personally, I subscribe to the same-length-as-the-vertical guideline.
My inverted-L is 55 feet of vertical tubing plus the horizontal 
wire.  My insulated, on the ground radials are 55.5 feet (9 radials 
out of a 500 ft roll of wire). By serendipity, measuring one radial 
against all of the rest with a VNWA it is resonant at 1.84 MHz.  To 
be fair, I still have fewer radials than planned (18 vs. 36) in which 
case, shorter is actually better according to Belrose and Severns 
(https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/files/antenna_ground_system_experiment_4.pdf).
Wes  N7WS


On 12/9/2020 7:00 PM, Raymond Benny wrote:
If your vertical is ground mounted you need alot [sic] more. I'd say atleast 36 radials, 135ft long. It will make a big difference in your signal and be
easier to match.

I have over 100 radials but probably an over kill, but I feel I have a good
signal on 160m.

Ray,
N6VR/ W7YA

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>