Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low Dipoles

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Low Dipoles
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:35:31 -0800
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 12/17/2020 12:28 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote:
I've had low (30-40' up) 160m dipoles in essentially 3 QTH's.and always had
inverted L's to do A/B realtime comparisons.

I'd define a dipole as "low" if it were less than 1/4 wavelength; I had one at 120 ft, less than a quarter wave. The virtue of having it lower than that, of course, is that it further suppresses low angle, potentially reducing local noise.

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>