To: | Charles Morrison <charles.morrison.n1rr@gmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Jan 2023 13:43:47 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 1:38 PM Charles Morrison < charles.morrison.n1rr@gmail.com> wrote: > Many poor operators in Europe do not respect an area CQ, especially on CW. > On SSB Many poor operators in Europe wont even respect a DX station when > he calls for a specific prefix or suffix, why would they respect an area CQ > ? > Yes. But certainly *some* operators will respect it. If Roger just calls CQ with no suffix, he's making it harder on himself. 73 Mike W0BTU > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW, Charles Morrison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW, Charles Morrison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW, Charles Morrison |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 160M Conditions - CQWW, Charles Morrison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |