Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: WSPR and topband

To: TreeN6TR <treen6tr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: WSPR and topband
From: STEVE MCDONALD <ve7sl@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:59:54 -0600 (MDT)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>

> Why not say 1.990 MHz to avoid QRM.

Mainly because nobody will be listening there. 

On most nights there are dozens and dozens of stations monitoring (actually 132 
at this moment) the standard 160m WSPR frequency. Overnight WSPR’ing has been 
with us for several years now and can’t really be compared to the typical CW 
beacons heard on 10 or 6m. On HF they are almost invisible to those using the 
band and their typically low power levels usually put them below the threshold 
of audibility by ear. They create no QRM unless you live down the street from 
one and are not continuous since they transmit at random periods throughout the 
hour at a user predetermined duty cycle. Most transmit once every 10 minutes or 
so. I see no reason why your WSPR propagation plans should not continue along 
with the numerous other ones on Topband.

Steve VE7SL  


WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.net/ve7sl/

VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": 
http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/ 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>