To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: E51D and OHQP |
From: | Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Aug 2023 18:35:04 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
And conversely (not that I'm an expert topbander), it might be true that
a good DX antenna is more than *adequate* for close in contacts in most
situations.
-Steve K8LX On 08/24/23 6:28 PM, Mike Waters wrote: Contrary to what you hear repeated on the bands year after year, what Jim said is *exactly* right! :-) I'll add that NVIS is rarely —if ever— useful for working DX on 160m. 73 Mike W0BTU https://web.archive.org/web/20190827040547/http://w0btu.com/ On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, 1:40 PM Jim Brown<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:... the optimum height for an NVIS antenna is a quarter-wave. Higher reduces upward radiation, lower increases ground loss. This study was peer reviewed. 73, Jim K9YC_________________ Searchable Archives:http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: E51D and OHQP, Mike Waters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: E51D and OHQP, Don Kirk |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: E51D and OHQP, Mike Waters |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: E51D and OHQP, Don Kirk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |