To: | Radio KH6O <radio.kh6o@gmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires |
From: | Ken WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:56:53 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Very interesting, thanks for sharing. I have seen similar information in one of the ARRL manuals, that elevated, insulated radials are more efficient than the typical ham buried 30 or 40 radials Perhaps that originated from the information you posted. Is it okay if I post your information to a ham antennas group? Ken WA8JXM On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 9:58 PM Radio KH6O <radio.kh6o@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is an interesting research paper by Clarence Beverage. > > -- > 73, > Jeff KH6O > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires, Steve Harrison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires, Steve Harrison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires, Tree |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires, Robin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |