Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: CQWW CW 160m

To: Roger Kennedy <roger@wessexproductions.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW CW 160m
From: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:55:05 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>

Hi Roger,

On 2024-11-27 11:44, Roger Kennedy wrote:
Yes conditions weren't very good on 160m over the weekend.

Yes, except for a few very brief periods of time and you almost had to be on the band to notice them
before they quickly disappeared.

Friday night was best for me, I popped on a couple of times during the night
and did manage about 10 NA QSOs.

However, I expected to hear more of the Big Guns from NA calling CQ, but
didn't !

There was no reason to be on 160 except if you were M/M or SB 160 and had to be there. Or else very briefly if you were Multi-something or single op. all band and you had a good enough antenna to potentially run some stations.

Rates were much better on 80 even though cndx were mostly marginal there as well. Most of the DX stations were on 10 - 20, or even 40 with far better signal strengths, higher rates and more mults to work. That's where the US stations wanted to be as well especially when 20 was open even though it was dark.

Only worked one additional NA station on Saturday night.

It seemed to me to be more a lack of activity than hopeless conditions.

Agreed. Cndx were not good on 160 but that wasn't the reason not to be there. It was that the other 5 bands were a better place to be except for the times when you could work some q's or mults on 160; which unfortunately becomes a largely self-fulfilling prophecy.

73

Bob, KQ2M

Roger G3YRO

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>