| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | EMT used as mast...NO! |
| From: | Hamforever@aol.com (Hamforever@aol.com) |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Oct 1996 15:36:34 -0400 |
I agree that the thin wall EMT is not suitable for masts to support beam antennae. The galvanizing disappears within two years and the masts fail shortly thereafter in our south Louisiana wx. 73 de John, WA5TWL -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: K7LXC@contesting.com Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & KM9P |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Rohn HDBX question, K7LXC@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Rotating Tower Sections, Robin E. Midgett |
| Previous by Thread: | EMT used as mast...NO!, Bill Coleman |
| Next by Thread: | Vertical Mast, Jay Pryor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |