To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Amateur Service reclassified to hobby by FCC? |
From: | w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN) |
Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:15:27 -0400 (EDT) |
> Let's try to not slam the gate on every single piece of mail that comes our > way > absent the word, "tower." Instead, lets try to see how the subject relates to the topic of the reflector as you have done with your message. Obviously this topic could have implications for tower owners. Discussing the those implications is FB. Otherwise, this is not the place. 73 Bill -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Amateur Service reclassified to hobby by FCC?, Jeff Singer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Cloud Burners, L. B. Cebik |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Amateur Service reclassified to hobby by FCC?, Jeff Singer |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Amateur Service reclassified to hobby by FCC?, K7LXC@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |