Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] RE: [DX] FORCE-12 ANTENNAS

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] RE: [DX] FORCE-12 ANTENNAS
From: morel.grunberg@telrad.co.il (Morel Grunberg)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 07:44:50 +0200
Frank,

Thank you for sharing us from your experience. 
What's the boom lenght of the new WARC-7 beam ?

Congratulation good K7K operation.

73 de Morel, 4X1AD 

> ----------
> From:         Frank R. Smith[SMTP:ah0w@pop.primenet.com]
> Sent:         þéåí øáéòé 22 àå÷èåáø 1997þ 00:01
> To:   dx@ve7tcp.ampr.org?;? topband@contesting.com
> Subject:      [DX] FORCE-12 ANTENNAS  
> 
>         
> DX Friends:
> 
> At the risk of upstaging any of Force-12's own material about
> a new Force-12 antenna, their new WARC-7, I wanted to make a few
> of my own comments in behalf of the K7K Kure DXpedition team.
> 
> We were very lucky to have received Force-12's new WARC tribander
> just in time for our DXpedition departure.  Constructed using
> linear loading on three elements,  the beam consists of 7 elements, 
> 2 on 30, 2 on 17 and 3 on 24.
> 
> As with other Force-12 beams, the antenna is quick and easy to
> put together.  In fact, we had lost the instructions, and due
> to our familiarity with constructing other Force-12's and thanks
> to clear marking on factory-installed element mounting brackets,
> Andy UA3AB and I were able to put the antenna together without
> instructions.  The whole process took us less than one hour and
> we had the beam up on a mast and on the air.
> 
> In assembling the elements themselves, it is a total impossiblity
> to couple the aluminum tubes incorrectly.  Each juncture requires
> rivets into factory pre-drilled openings with a unique pattern of
> rivet openings at each juncture.  If you get the tubes backwards,
> the rivets won't match.  And unlike other antennas, there's
> absolutely no need for a measuring tape and the frustration of 
> using stubborn hose clamps.
> 
> Putting the WARC-7 on the air, of course, is the most important
> test.  The antenna was especially effective on 10.1 and 18 mHz
> especially
> since that's where the propagation was favorable (for us), but upon
> QSYing to 24 mHz we had very good signal reports.  But "good"
> is a weak word here.  Reports were consistent that the signals on
> these bands were among the strongest.  We would become accustomed to
> hearing very nice adjectives like "fabulous signal", "one of the best
> on 18 I've ever heard," "a true twenty over", etc.
> 
> And all this with relatively low power!
> 
> The only problem we encountered with the antenna was a male Frigate
> bird who took a liking to the reflector and decided to make the 
> WARC-7 his new perch on Kure.  No amount of shaking and rotating
> would dislodge the stubborn bird.  The second nighttime of the 
> operation, the Frigate bird landed onto the antena with such force
> that the antenna shifted inside the mounting bracket leaving the 
> antenna somewhere between horizontally and vertically polarized!
> But it still worked great.
> 
> If anyone reading this is considering a new WARC antena, we'd 
> recommend serious consideration of tihs new Force-12 WARC-7 beam.
> We've got several orders of our own in already so you'll have to
> get in line!
> 
> 73
> 
> Frank Smith AH0W/OH2LVG
> Midway-Kure DX Foundation
> 
> 
> ----
> Forwarded via the Internet DX Mailing List
> Submissions:                    dx@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Subscribe/unsubscribe requests: dx-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> DX info on the Web:             http://ve7tcp.ampr.org/DX/
> 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] RE: [DX] FORCE-12 ANTENNAS, Morel Grunberg <=