K7LXC wrote:
>
> In a message dated 97-12-16 04:35:11 EST, k4mzw@akorn.net writes:
>
> > I agree with Tom; anyone with the space shpould consider a small tri-bander
> > at 30-35 feet just for those times when "LOWER" is better usually in
> > conterst the lower antenna will get you heard, all else being equal!
>
> Two points. First, I agree with the high desireability of having a low
> antenna. There have been times when N7TT has been calling and calling a
> Caribbean station with his high antennas and I sneak in with my 50' tribander
> and work them. I'm in and out and he's still callling.
>
> Second, IMO the key to contesting station success on ANY band is to have a
> choice of antennas. One will generally be better than the other at some time
> and it's not always the same one. Sometimes it's the OTHER one!
>
> Viva la flexibility.
>
> 73, Steve K7LXC
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
And then theres times, like in the ten meter test, where none of them
seem to work.
Bob N8YGG
15 miles east of Dayton
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|