And I thought IMHO and IMO were legitimate
LEGAL disclaimers (IMHO) :) 73, Bob AA0CY
----------
From: K7LXC@aol.com[SMTP:K7LXC@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 4:51 PM
To: w2up@itw.com
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower info--"Duty to inform"
In a message dated 98-02-03 18:46:25 EST, w2up@itw.com writes:
> They are claiming that it is the conference organizer's
> responsibility to validate all material presented.
>
> Just think... If the conference organizer is held liable, K7LXC
> (and W4AN?) could be held liable for any misinformation posted on
> this reflector, leading to harm.
>
Interesting...and true I imagine. We live in a litiguous society and
although I'm not aware of any lawsuits along the lines you mentioned in our
hobby, it is certainly (gulp!) possible. Maybe I should talk to my attorney to
see what sort of a disclaimer I need. (Hey, O'Connell - are you any help
here?)
73, Steve K7LXC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|