James R. Duffey wrote:
> 5. Location is probably more important than antenna performance. A
> poor
> antenna at a good site can outperform a good antenna at a poor site.
> Of
> course, this is no justification for having a poorly performing
> antenna, an
> a good antenna at a good site is a tough combination to beat.
This probably explains why at times my 5 watt station
beats out one of the local stations running 100 watts.
Both stations have 3 elem tri-banders. Mine at 64 feet, and
his at 48 feet.
VE6NAO/QRP
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|