Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] New York Times Article--reply

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article--reply
From: tleaf@hotmail.com (Ted Leaf)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 02:24:18 PST

>From owner-towertalk@contesting.com Mon Mar  9 13:04:43 1998
>Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [205.217.100.11])
>       by dayton.akorn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA24796;
>       Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:04:29 -0500 (EST)
>Received: by dayton.akorn.net (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 
00:29:32)); Mon, 09 Mar 1998 16:04:18 -0500 (EST)
>From: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 16:07:31 -0500
>Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
>To: "'Roger L. Elowitz'" <K2JAS@worldnet.att.net>, 
towertalk@contesting.com
>Message-id: <0EPK00GCIL69NS@PM02SM.PMM.MCI.NET>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
>Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>X-Priority: 3
>Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Precedence: bulk
>X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
>
>You're right, Roger. It's a great article. So good, in fact, that I am
>probably going to send the link to a few friends who are "on the fence"
>about getting their ticket.
>
>Anthony Scandurra - KG2MY
>UNIX System Administrator - FileNET Systems
>Phone: (302)434-7655
>Fax: (302)594-4020
>Email: AnthonyScandurra@FirstUSA.com
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:        Roger L. Elowitz [SMTP:K2JAS@worldnet.att.net]
>> Sent:        Monday, March 09, 1998 3:49 PM
>> To:  towertalk@contesting.com
>> Subject:     [TowerTalk] New York Times Article
>> 
>> Hi Gang,
>> 
>> We've recently read in this esteemed forum posts decrying the New 
York
>> Times article that contained several inaccuracies. What appears to be
>> missed is that in spite of these glaring errors (glaring to us at
>> least)
>> the article is a much needed bit of positive publicity. 
>> 
>> You are invited to read the article on-line for yourselves and make 
up
>> your
>> own minds as to it's merits.... always a good thing. Go to......
>> 
>> 
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/98/03/circuits/articles/05ham-radi
>> o.html
>> 
>> It's an interesting read and I highly recommend it to you.
>> 
>> Roger, K2JAS/4
>> 
>> 

Roger Guys,

While there was some errors, that only hams would recognize, it was very 
favorable to ham radio.

The ARRLLETTER said, that because of it, the AARL has received many 
inquires on how to become a ham.

73, Aloha
Ted Leaf, K6HI
Kona, Hawaii
<tleaf@hotmail.com>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>