[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36

Towertalk

[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36

To:	<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36
From:	harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date:	Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:35:38 -0400 (EDT)

TA designator meant, among other things, split coax feed directly to two
halves of the driven el.
CL meant a different feed system.
K4VUD


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Dennis Schaefer [TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Charles H. Harpole <= [TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Gary R. Hosler [TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Tom Osborne [TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Charles H. Harpole [TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Gary R. Hosler

Previous by Date:	[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Dennis Schaefer
Next by Date:	[TowerTalk] Letter from Cushcraft, K7LXC@aol.com
Previous by Thread:	[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Dennis Schaefer
Next by Thread:	[TowerTalk] TA-36 vs. Classic 36, Gary R. Hosler
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]