To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Small 160 M receiving Antennas |
From: | 107770.3462@compuserve.com (James P. Cassidy) |
Date: | Fri, 1 Jan 1999 14:53:29 -0500 |
I would like any input I can get on effectiveness of the EWE antennas or shortened slinky beverage antennas. I don't have room for full size beverages. From what I have heard so far there is dispute regarding how well these work. Please reply direct, unless you think everyone would be interested. TNX ,HNY 73 Jim KI7Y -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: Pencil marks (are BAD!), Bill Aycock |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] TX Ant gain vs. RX Ant gain (was: Dollars per dB), Scott Townley |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: Pencil marks (are BAD!), Bill Aycock |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Small 160 M receiving Antennas, Mike Anderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |