Dick,
I too have tried the Autek and the MFJ and found the AEA superior in
the information it displays, the functionality, and the convenience of
use, not to mentioned the additional benefit of the supporting
software for storing, and viewing results on the PC. The tuning on the
autek is too critical. The visual representation of information on the
AEA is a real help in understanding what is going.
73...DX...Don...W4TO
----- Original Message -----
From: Dick Green <dick.green@valley.net>
To: Tower <towertalk@contesting.com>; jimi <jimi@designet.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] AEA CIA-HF
>
> > Just ordered the AEA CIA-HF. Been borrowing an MFJ-259B, and
decided to
> take a step up. Did I make a good decision?
>
> I think so. I've used the MFJ, Autek and CIA-HF, and there's no
question in
> my mind that the AEA is the superior instrument. It's the most
accurate and
> the most flexible. I use software written by Grant Bingham to store
and
> print performance curves for all of my antennas. That makes it very
easy to
> identify changes over time.
>
> 73, Dick WC1M
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:
http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|