> Look a little deeper into the issue. The "older
> one" (40-2CD) is not
> the same as the XM240. There have been reports here
> on TT of the CC
> XM240 not being a worthy successor.
>
> I have a 40-2CD and love it, but I would probably go
> with a F12 if I
> had to chose between it and a CC XM240.
40-2CD was electrically a good antenna but the
mechanical part was lousy. The Upgrade available from
a W9.... ( dont remember) is a must.
73 Rag
_____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Få din egen, gratis @yahoo.no-adresse på http://mail.yahoo.no
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|