Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Other Verticals

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Other Verticals
From: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:21:01 -0500


----- Original Message -----
From: <K7LXC@aol.com>
To: <avraham@cruzio.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Other Verticals



In a message dated 99-11-24 23:49:46 EST, avraham@cruzio.com writes:

>> Questions:
>>           Claim #1: ZR3 needs no radials.

>    True. It's 3 half-wave dipoles (10, 15 & 20) bent into a (fairly) compact
>design. As a dipole, it doesn't need radials.

It will be further helped by a ground screen underneath, if it's 2 feet over
dirt. See much discussion on ground screens in the last couple of months.
- - . . .   . . . - -     .   . . .     - - .   . - . .

73, Guy
k2av@contesting.com
Apex, NC, USA




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>