Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Rombic antennas better then beams???????????

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rombic antennas better then beams???????????
From: i4jmy@iol.it (i4jmy@iol.it)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:47:06 +0100
The rhombic antenna is also a wide band aerial that may cover, of 
course with different performances, several bands.
Unidirectionality and (some) constant impedance are also obtained 
terminating the antenna in a dummy load, a load that needs to be 
proportioned to the used power because about half of the delivered 
power is not radiated but just dissipated there.
Unless the space and the peculiar environment required to install a big 
rhombic (several wavelenghts of space and supporting towers to allow 
the correct tilt) is already available, a yagi or a phased array can 
offer a bigger gain in a much smaller size and area.

73,
Mauri I4JMY

> Hi Jack,
> 
> > Which has more gain.
> > 
> > Jack
> 
> A large Rhombic has more gain than a small beam.
> 
> A large beam has more gain than a small Rhombic.
> 
> For a given amount of space, a properly built "beam" will always 
> have MUCH more gain than a Rhombic.
> 
> For a given beamwidth of the main lobe, the beam will have more 
> gain than a Rhombic.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 73, Tom W8JI
> w8ji@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>