Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Inaccurate Bird Slugs.

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Inaccurate Bird Slugs.
From: w7ts@Qwest.net (Ken Kinyon - W7TS)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:26:25 -0700
I have discovered that at least two of my bird slugs seem to be out of
tolerance.  My 2500H appears to read about 1/3 low.
Can these be repaired or recalibrated?
Thanks,
Ken W7TS
-------------------
Kenneth E.  Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice/fax  (303) 684-0037
E-mail W7TS@Qwest.net
ALPCA #8339
ARRL-LM
-----------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
[mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of n4kg@juno.com
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 09:20
To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com; aunwin@fgi.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ideal Antenna rejection characteristics


F/B ratio is largely a matter of personal preference.
Contesters in the North East USA like high F/B to
reduce interference from the rest of the country
while they cream us into Europe.

Personally, from SE USA, I prefer a low F/B (10 dB)
so that I can hear/work multipliers off the back of the antenna.
This is especially useful for hunt and call type of operating.

When I changed from a 2L Quad on one of my towers to
a TH7 (which is normally parked on Africa), I found that I
could no longer hear / work stations in the Pacific as I
did with the Quad.

On the WARC bands I use only dipoles and Long Wire
antennas with ZERO  F/B.  This is only a problem when
there is simultaneous Short and Long Path propagation
causing a lot of echo that can make copy difficult.  I have
worked over 310 countries on each of the WARC bands
with these simple antennas.

de  Tom  N4KG

On Mon, 15 Jan 2001  Arthur Unwin <aunwin@fgi.net> writes:
> A review of presently offered H.F. Yagis show
> in general >20 db for F/B or F/R  ACROSS a band
> One antenna manuf points to a a 38 db MAX which
> one may assume means a steep fall off either side.
> The Antenna Handbook seems to strive for even HIGHER
> rejection ACROSS band which would appear that there
> is some desirability for a  HIGHER  level of rear rejection,
> but for whome and  what level would satisfy those needs?
> Do DX's have different needs than the normal
> ham ? Is it a technical plateau preventing increases in
> this area, or is it that further increases in this area would
> be perceieved as a negative by some users?
> Art Unwin
> KB9MZ
> aunwin@fgi.net
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>