Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Iverted-L Support.

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Iverted-L Support.
From: w9ol@billnjudy.com (Bill)
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:58:38 -0600
I once had antenna all droopy
it'S swr presented all goofy
I tuned it up full
The balun it blew
My neighbors did all yell WHOOPEE!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris BONDE" <ve7hcb@rac.ca>
To: <antennas@qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Antennas] Iverted-L Support.


> Ah, If I could conspire
> To an antenna entire
> On a palm tree, my radio and thee
> Wouldnot that Paradise  be.   (Apologees to E Fitzgerald)
>
> I agree.  An antenna is better than no antenna.  Some hams have better
> antenas and some have better QTHs and (forgive me for covetting) some
have
> both.
>
> I have a loaded droopy dipole, 21 ft apex, 15ft ends.  Urban QTH,
mountains
> to the N and NE.
>
> But I have WAS on 75m with 100w.  Yah
>
> Chris opr VE7HCB
>
>
> At 07:14 PM 2001-02-08 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi Anthony,
> >
> >If I understood you correctly, you are wondering if it'd be ok to
drop the
> >vertical section parallel to the wooden support?
> >Don't know what the rocket scientists would say but I have had many
inverted
> >els that way and they worked great. I tie an insulator at the top of
a palm
> >tree and slip the downward potion of the wire through it. The antenna
is fed
> >at the bottom of the tree (almost at  the root!). Worked 100+
countries with
> >100W that way! Now, if someone says that I could have worked another
50 if
> >the tree wasn't there....I'd say I'd have worked NOTHING if not for
the
> >tree!!! BTW, that was on 160m.
> >
> >I have heard it said that wet trees and other foliage absord RF only
at UHF.
> >If at all, there might be certain capacitive effects that may require
the
> >length to be adjusted a bit for resonance. I'm prepared to stand
corrected
> >on the latter!!
> >
> >73,
> >Ron, 4S7RO/6Y5
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Anthony Bowyer <adb1x1@yahoo.com>
> >To: <antennas@qth.net>
> >Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:14 PM
> >Subject: [Antennas] Iverted-L Support.
> >
> >
> > > I've noticed several inverted-L postings here, but
> > > none of them address a question I have. I plan to
> > > mount an Inverted-L at approx. 50ft, with a vertical
> > > section about 5 feet off the ground. I have a nice
> > > tree support for one end of the horizontal wire, but I
> > > have to fabricate one at the vertical section end. I
> > > have a 4x4 in the ground that was used to support a
> > > mast and I was giving consideration to using wood as a
> > > support. As a matter of fact I have a tall straight
> > > pine tree that need to be cut down, so, I wanted to
> > > use it. Does anyone know how much of a problem it
> > > might be to have this 'pole' within a foot or less of
> > > the vertical section?  Thanks!!!!
> > >
> > > =====
> > > NT4X
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
> > > a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > >
> > > ------
> > > Submissions: antennas@qth.net
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >------
> >Submissions: antennas@qth.net
>
>
> ------
> Submissions: antennas@qth.net
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Iverted-L Support., Bill <=