Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array ..

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array ..
From: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:56:41 EDT
In a message dated 4/5/01 12:54:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
n4zr@contesting.com writes:

<< At 02:33 PM 4/5/01 +0100, Bill Tippett wrote:
 ...
 >P.S.  Personally, I would go with a driven system (Comtek) if I were 
 >using full-size dipoles...you only need 4 instead of 5 and the results
 >are more predictable using a forced system IMHO.
 
 Actually, the parasitic systems work fine with 4 or even three dipoles,
 although the beamwidth increases proportionately.  Wx0B and I are arguing
 offline about which system shows better F/B and gain in modeling...
 
 One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that the tower in the center of
 such an array can play a significant role, at least as reflected in the
 currents that flow on it.  I'm not sure what experience has been with the
 effect of a tower in the center of a 4-square.
 
 73, Pete N4ZR
 Contesting is!
  >>
Why not use a telephone pole?  k7gco

List Sponsor:  ChampionRadio.com - Trylon self-supporting towers, safety
equipment, rigging gear, LOOS tension guages & more!  
http://www.championradio.com

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>