Alex;
The fastest way to be removed from this list (and many others) is to
initiate and or continue personal attacks. It is in extreme poor taste
and out of context.
I believe Pete has reenforced what he intended.
Technical debate is what reflectors/news groups were intended for.
Season's Greetings.
Jim, K4SQR
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 10:34:52 -0500 "alex" <alex@sandlabs.com> writes:
>
> Tom,
>
> You must have your brains fried :( You have no idea of System
> Engineering as
> you would recognize that this is what the allured pages are talking
> about.
> These pages speak about Power supply, Harmonic Filters , System
> Monitors
> etc,etc ... in essence about an entire Amplifier. If you can not
> recognize
> so much I wonder how you do your the job.
>
> Have you seen much allusion to Helgi Grandberg or Motorola in
> Ameritron's
> ALS-600 ?
> Speaking about reliability and ALS-600 that blew up in my face once
> I turned
> it on. Did _you_ design it ?
>
> As far where the schematic come, it is part of the VHDL library
> included in
> Xilinx. It is guarantied - and verified by us- that it works. I do
> not
> believe that a TTL data book will depict the entire and functional
> schematic
> of their technology even if it is this low level. This shows how
> little you
> know and that your approach to engineering is in a cook book style.
> Take it
> away and you're lost :(
>
> But I do not believe you know what VHDL or Xilinx stands for :(
>
>
> As far the relays et all. There are many ways to skin a cat. Once
> choses
> what he seems to be more confortable with. And this is fine. But
> from a
> question of how to implement something to your
> inflamatory mesage is just to much.
>
> What is it Tom, you feel somebody wants to take your throne ? A
> "coup
> d'etat" ? Hi ... Hi... Hi ...
>
>
> I'm am sick of your innuendo ... Just go away ... you are now in the
> /null/device.
> I hate mediocrity :(
>
>
>
>
>
> Alex
>
>
> ===================================
>snip>
>
> ==================================.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@akorn.net>
> To: "TowerTalk Reflector" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Pete Smith"
> <n4zr@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 9:37 PM
> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit
>
>
> >
> > > >try http://www.sandlabs.com/answers.htm
> > > >(verified as good before transmission of this note.)
> > >
> > > Yes, but there was a reason I specified passive decoding -- I
> don't
> > > want to have to power an IC or individual gates at the tower,
> nor do I
> > > want to have to protect them against static
> electricity/lightning EMP.
> >
> > Right you are Pete.
> >
> >
> > Almost anyone can design (or copy) a complicated and fragile
> > system. Real engineering involves improving reliability and
> > simplicity while reducing cost.
> > 73, Tom W8JI
> > W8JI@contesting.com
> >
> > AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading
> tables,
> > foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at
> the
> > AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
> >
> > -----
> >
AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading tables,
foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|