Would you gentlemen please advise how long will this junior high level
peeing contest will go on, so I know when to start reading this reflector
again?
73, Jerry W5KP
----- Original Message -----
From: "alex" <alex@sandlabs.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more)
>
> Oh... my ... I do not know where I turned wrong ... Or the world twisted
...
>
> I just responded to a question, remember? Can one do it on a passive
level?
> And I answered NO. and I given the reasons. I _SUGGESTED_ to use an IC
> rather than going to the extent of a discrete design. Check the site
pages
> again.
>
> Oh ... English reading comprehension! Must be very low ....
>
>
> Alex.
>
>
>
> ===================================
> If we can accept the notion that GUNS are
> the killers and not the people, why is it that
> we can not accept the idea that CARS are
> the speeders and not the drivers?
>
> Alex, trying to understand the world around.
>
> ==================================.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Gilmer - N2MG" <n2mg@contesting.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 11:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (more)
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, 24 December 2001, "alex" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I do not think that it was a misstatement. When you
> > > deploy something in a CRITICAL environment
> > > you need to think at the System level.
> >
> > This is obvious. Your statement:
> >
> > "The sensitivity of an IC to it's environment,
> > depends on SYSTEM design and not on the IC itself"
> >
> > is incorrect. Both "system" and "IC" desing need to be
> > taken into account. Why use a "weak" IC when a more
> > robust one is available?
> >
> > > Integrated Circuits are very vulnerable, even
> > > Hardrads, if their limitations are not incorporated
> > > in the total System Design. In the Ham case the
> > > Antenna Field represents a Radiation Hazard for the
> > > IC. Thus Hamming is out of the door and you need
> > > start thinking as a "rocket engineer" :)
> >
> > My point exactly. Why force the needs of a rocket
> > designer on a ham who simply wants a one-time only,
> > inexpensive, reliable design? There are practically
> > no size or weight limitations... no acceleration, no
> > vibration, no altitude, no corona, etc.
> >
> > A mature designer knows when simple is better - even
> > if not as much fun.
> >
> > Mike N2MG
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart.
> > http://www.peoplepc.com
> >
> > AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading
tables,
> > foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
> > AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
> >
> > -----
> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> > Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> >
>
>
> AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading tables,
> foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
> AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
>
> -----
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>
>
AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available! Windloading tables,
foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
AN Wireless Web site: http://www.ANWireless.com
-----
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|