There is another thing coming, and depending upon the explanation might
harm Hams.
The tall tower!! There is a place in the south coast of BC that allow a
company to replace the tower with another one. Now this tower opens garage
doors, makes VCR inoperable, unless the owner stand in one place, prevents
vehicle owners from opening their keyless vehicles, turns off microwave
ovens, plus a few other things. The people are wondering what it might do
to their health. That big bad tower!!
I wonder what power and how many different frequencies (and at what
frequency) exits at tha site? Would a very flare shoot high enough to burn
something?
Chris opr VE7HCB.
At 08:16 PM 2002-04-22 -0400, you wrote:
>In many cases the deed restrictions and covenants are imposed on the
>developer by his bank as a condition for getting financing for the
>subdivision project. Perhaps we need to talk to bankers also.
>
>My parents were taking out a loan to buy a condo, and my mom expressed
>concern about all of the rules at the new place. The bank loan officer
>told them that the rules were for their own good, because otherwise
>"some ham radio operator might move in next door". He didn't have a good
>comeback when she said that her son is a ham radio operator. They
>eventually decided to stay in their present, non-CC&R'd, home.
>
>Even if you yourself do not live in such a neighborhood, these
>restrictions impose a burden on the Ham Radio community in general since
>they impede our ability to recruit and retain new hams. As such, they
>are a threat to all of us. If the FCC can intervene against CC&R's for
>DSS owners, they can also intervene on behalf of the Amateur Radio
>Service, now that the precedent has been established. The FCC needs to
>explain to us why they think that they do have authority over satellite
>dishes but not for ham antennas.
>
>Dan N8FGV
>
>_______________________________________________
>Towertalk mailing list
>
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|