To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs? |
From: | k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK) |
Date: | Fri, 24 May 2002 12:20:24 -0400 |
Fred, > 2. "In no event shall structures for amateur radio use represent > a noxious, illegal or offensive use of the property, nor an annoyance or > nuisance to the neighborhood." Doesn't "annoyance" give some overly zealous architectural review committee an opportunity to declare a tower "offensive" or a "nuisance?" Wouldn't a simple prohibition of commercial structures work better? 73, ... Joe, K4IK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs?, Fred Hopengarten |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] Dayton declining..., Ed Dial |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs?, Fred Hopengarten |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs?, k0sd@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |