I said all things being equal, and unless I know more about the groundplane
arrangements of the L vs the Cushcraft vertical, siting etc can only make
general comments.
However, on the basis of years of experience operating from a town house
before shifting to this QTH would make the following suggestions on small
lot antennas for 80.
(1) if possible roof mount or pole mount the vertical (any vertical) so as
much of it as possible is above power lines, house wiring etc.
(2) use elevated radials, at least one 1/4 wave long even if you have to
snake it around the boundary of the lot.
(3) use a balun to decouple the vert/radial system from the feedline
(4) experiment with dedicated receive antennas such as loops, short sloping
dipoles etc.
Following these principles my 80 m 1/4 wave inverted L with vertical section
only 20ft was vastly superior to a hygain vertical (like 20dB) and worked
many countries on 80cw plus respectable contest places.
The L compared well in comparison with local operators using inverted vees,
full size verticals etc.
73
Barry
end
Barry Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD
Signal Hill Homestay
66 Cory Road
Palm Beach
Waiheke Island 1240
NEW ZEALAND
phone/fax 64-9-372-5161
www.waiheke.co.nz/signal.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark" <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
To: "Barry Kirkwood" <bjk@ihug.co.nz>; <genewill@ordata.com>; "Tower Talk"
<towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 10 July, 2002 0:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] Inv L
> Errrr... ahhhh .. hmmmm .. do not agree .. here, downtown Eureka, far
north
> CA ... have inverted L on 75M --- due to the limited lot space (not normal
> for me, but will have to live with rest of my life) --- NOIZE is rampant
..
> works OK, but often no bettter than my
> CrunchCraft vertical. .. .. .. The ground side of the Perveted L is
> connected to the entire city's water system .. perhaps where the NOIZE
come
> from? .. HI .. all seriousness aside, have a major noise problem here, so
> won't normally be winning the contests... regardless of transmitting
power,
> ya gotta hear them to work them .. unless you do be do list bunny! BUT ..
> have used 160M ILs for many years... worky worky! As to 75M .. will have
> new standard old droopy dipole up this week .. fed with RG-214, NO cheesy
> Balun .. if I have problems along that line, will use the ferrite beads I
> have .. but, worked thousands of Qs without that in the past, so going to
> hook up Mr. Heath SB-220 and see what flies.................may have to
> "bend the ends", have HV lines too close to go over 35-40'.
> \Cheers, y'all .. Mark 6dx
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barry Kirkwood" <bjk@ihug.co.nz>
> To: <genewill@ordata.com>; "Tower Talk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:56 PM
> Subject: [Towertalk] Inv L
>
>
> > Inverted L does very well on 80 and 40 (will eat any all band vertical
on
> > these bands, other things equal).
> > On 40 and 80 it is not too difficult to get full size or top hat
verticals
> > operational hence inv L not as popular.
> > IMHO lots of operators would do better on DX on 80 with an inverted L
than
> > with other popular antennas eg low dipoles.
> > 73
> >
> > end
> > Barry Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD
> > Signal Hill Homestay
> > 66 Cory Road
> > Palm Beach
> > Waiheke Island 1240
> > NEW ZEALAND
> > phone/fax 64-9-372-5161
> > www.waiheke.co.nz/signal.htm
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Self Supporting Towers, Wireless Weather Stations, see web site:
> http://www.mscomputer.com
> > Call 888-333-9041 to place your order, mention you saw this ad and take
an
> additional 5 percent off
> > any weather station price.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Towertalk mailing list
> > Towertalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
>
|