Optimum for what? And from where?
For my use I would consider a stack of 6's to be too narrow for
contesting from the northeast. Up here a stack of 4's is probably
better to cover more of Europe at one time. From farther west maybe the
6's would be better as the angular spread to cover Europe for contesting
is smaller, or if you are dxing, ragchewing, or handling point to point
traffic the 6's may be reasonable.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-admin@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> admin@contesting.com] On Behalf Of n4kg@juno.com
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 03:10
> To: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> Subject: [Towertalk] OPTIMIZED ANTENNA SYSTEM
>
> My vote for the optimum antenna system is for:
>
> 4 High Stacks of 6L Monobanders on 3/4 WL booms
> spaced equally on 3WL high rotating towers, for EACH
> band, with ALL combinations instantly switch selectable.
>
> Make that a stacked pair on 40M on a 1.5 WL high tower
> (200-ft)
>
> OH, did I hear someone complain about the price?
> Or space requirements?
>
> Well then, start making COMPROMISES
> that fit YOUR requirements. :-)
>
> Tom N4KG
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
> Only $9.95 per month!
> Visit www.juno.com
> _______________________________________________
> AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers at discounted prices,
> See http://www.mscomputer.com
>
> Wireless Weather Stations now $349.95. Call Toll Free,
> 888-333-9041 for additional information.
> _______________________________________________
> Towertalk mailing list
> Towertalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|