Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30

To: Richard Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30
From: david jordan <wa3gin@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:15:21 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
One could argue that bending the element 90 degrees does not have the effects you discibe as linear loading.

Have you actually tried it?

73,
dave
wa3gin

Richard Karlquist wrote:

Folding the element does little to reduce the performance. It looks hokie, but it's simple, light weight, more efficient than lumped inductance. The wires have to clear whats underneath but it's a

wa3gin



No. A properly designed lumped inductance is better than linear
loading. That's why many 80 meter Yagi owners have upgraded to
W6ANR's aftermarket loading inductors, replacing the original linear
loading. Linear loading is a marketing concept to make you think
you have eliminated the ohmic losses associated with loading coils. Instead, it *increases* the losses.


Rick N6RK





_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>