To: | "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>,"towertalk reflector" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] GROUND RADIAL SYSTEM MAGAZINE ARTICLES |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:07:09 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 02:40 PM 12/22/2003 -0600, hasan schiers wrote:
In QST sometime in the last 3 or 4 months there was an EXCELLENT article that showed how to put down the most efficient radial system for any given length of wire you have available. It's based on the famous Brown study, and I found it to be one of the quickest and most efficient ways to practically determine how to lay out your radial field for a ground mounted vertical. The Brown study was for ground wave at roughly 1 MHz, not for skywave at 3.5 MHz and higher. The advice in the article is fine if you're building an AM broadcast station. The optimization in the QST article was for various gauges of wire and length and made some fundamental assumptions about soil conductivity and what the current distribution would be, ultimately drawing on Brown's work, which, again, was for frequencies around 1 MHz. I don't have it in front of me, but as I recall, either the author of the most recent QST article, or the previous ground radial article a few years back, also rolled in the induced ground return current distributions (that is, most of the return current is close to the base, so there's a diminishing returns as you get farther out), once again derived from Brown. To be useful, the optimization should really figure out what's the best approach for a given expenditure of time and money. Copper wire, to a first order, is priced by the pound. Are you better off buying a lot of thin wire or a little bit of thick wire? Labor to a first order is proportional to total length of all the radials combined(you've got to slit/trench/lay the wire). If you're trying to minimize resistive ground losses, it's not a trivial computation, because of skin effect, both for the soil and for the wire you're using (thin wire gives you more total feet of wire, for a given weight of copper, but skin effect losses are greater, and there's less surface area of the wire in contact with the soil) ...hasan, N0AN ----- Original Message ----- From: "GALE STEWARD" <k3nd@yahoo.com> To: "towertalk reflector" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: [TowerTalk] GROUND RADIAL SYSTEM MAGAZINE ARTICLES _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] INSURANCE, Joe Giacobello |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] INSURANCE, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] GROUND RADIAL SYSTEM MAGAZINE ARTICLES, hasan schiers |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Tram - Clarification, K7LXC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |