Re: [TowerTalk] square towers

[Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>]

At 05:01 PM 1/25/04 +0000, Jim Jarvis wrote:
> I've requested pricing, but my expectation would be that
> this design will prove 30-50% more expensive than a triangular
> design of equivalent specification, delivered US domestic.
>
> OTOH, the lifting fixture is a neat idea...and might be able to
> be incorporated on a triangular tower, to facilitate assembly.
>
> This one is worth keeping an eye on.


As I recall, the prices being quoted at Dayton last spring were pretty 
stiff, even for an aluminum self-supporting tower.

What I'd like to see is someone with a more conventional self-supporting 
design, like maybe AN Towers, figure out a way to  run an elevator for the 
rotator, mast and antennas up the side on a track.  That would get around 
the main disadvantage of the Hazer design (having to drop and 
reconnect/retension guy wires) and be very neat, *if* it could be strong 
enough.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the World HF Contest Station Database
Updated 9 Jan 04
www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm



_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk