To: | towertalk reflector <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators |
From: | Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net> |
Date: | Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:38:33 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Somebody suggested in a private message (not to the reflector) that they
are different: "effective moment" takes into account the distance from
the axis of each component of the total load, whereas Yaesu's "K-factor"
assumes that the whole of the load is located at the farthest point from
the axis. (That's my summary of his argument, not his precise wording.)
Thus the "K-factor" is an extremely conservative approximation of the
effective moment. Would you agree? Alan AB2OS On 07/01/04 01:10 pm K7LXC@aol.com put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: Is Yaesu's "K-factor" the same as Hy-Gain's "Effective moment"? Yes - they are both weight times turning radius._______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Tower Insurance, richard neff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Funniest thing I've seen in weeks, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators, K7LXC |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Effective moment and K-factor. Was: Yaesu rotators, TexasRF |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |