Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 55 vs. Rohn 45

To: k1ttt@arrl.net, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 55 vs. Rohn 45
From: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:43:36 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
From: k1ttt@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 55 vs. Rohn 45
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Message-ID: <3263.12.26.28.74.1105619097.squirrel@12.26.28.74>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1

>
>> OK, here's a toss up that should generate some real discussion:

> nope, probably very little discussion.

> The answer is:  You won't find anyone who is properly qualified to answer
those questions who will dare do it in a forum like this.

Huh?!? Why is that?

Tower capacity is directly related to leg strength; the more compression it'll 
take - the more load and wind it'll take. 55G is significantly stronger because 
of the addition wall thickness of the legs. Pretty simple.

Cheers,
Steve    K7LXC
TOWER TECH 
Professional tower services for commercial and amateur
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>