To: | towertalk@contesting.com, towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher? |
From: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:46:55 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Why do you think the oldtimers used ceramic insulators on both the feedline and antenna? If matched and you have low loss feedline , a short dipole radiates just fine. But, the antenna systems Q will go up drastically. This high Q is the real problem. And just a matter of physics. No way around it. Along with the expensive components in the antenna tuner to accommodate the high circulating currents and voltages due the high antenna system Q. You could put inductance at the feed point to nullify the capacitive component of the antenna's impedance but the Q will still be high and it would only be useful at only one narrow band of frequencies. 73 Bill wa4lav _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher?, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher?, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] XM-240 on 30m ?, Markhasin, Vitaly |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Dipole Longer or higher?, Jim Lux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |