I think this discussion, though interesting, may be irrelevant: In my
experience, if you have erected, assembled, or built any type of
engineered structure which then fails for any reason at all, if it is
found that you made any changes, additions, alterations, or modifications
to the structure without the written and sealed direction of an engineer,
(and preferably the original designer or an engineer from the original
company) you should at the very least consider yourself to be completely
uninsured in the event that the failure has caused any damages or losses.
Any premiums you are now paying could be a wasted investment.
Odds are that any insurance company will first investigate whether the
failing structure was properly installed, and then will check to see
whether it was modified or used improperly. Remember, they don't like to
pay and will spend lots of money trying to avoid it.
I could give lots of details, but I don't think they are necessary.
Sorry for the very long sentence.
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:29:39 -0600 Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
writes:
> Don Moman wrote:
>
> > Count me firmly in the side that approves of guying a self
> supporting tower.
> > And I can personally attest to VA5DX Doug's experience with guyed
> Delhi
> > structures - he has been there and done it and they have
> survived..... with
> > significant loads such as 4 el 40m KLM's to well over 100 feet.
> And in
> > Canada what we refer to as the "Coke Bottle" style of Delhi
> (older stuff
> > with stepped transitions) appears very similar to Rohn BX.
>
>
> At one time I had the 4L 40m KLM at 132 feet on a Delhi guyed
> tower.
> At another time I had a wind come through here that broke the boom
> of the
> KLM but did no damage to the Delhi tower. That's a 42 foot boom
> with lots or
> torque.
>
> > Look at any Rohn tower book or spec - Rohn tower sections are
> self
> > supporting to "X" feet. Add guy wires and the structure is good
> to X plus
> > many more feet.
>
>
> So now we have two tower manufacturers, Delhi and Rohn, that state
> or imply that
> a sensibly guyed three legged self-supporting tower is fine.
> None have said not to guy.
>
> Doug/VA5DX
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
> "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,
> 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|