As Tom pointed out, my quick and dirty model of a NEC antenna didn't
comport well with the usual wisdom on antennas (i.e. low antennas are
inefficent). It showed virtually the same gain at 50cm as 10m.
A bit of investigation has found the reason.
I did all the models with exactly the same length of wire and the wire was
lossless.
When it's only 50 cm off the ground, the feedpoint impedance gets highly
reactive (because of the dielectric loading of the earth). (we're talking a
few ohms resistive and hundreds of ohms reactive).
If you actually built such an antenna you'd
a) need a (lossy) matching network
b) even if the network were lossless, the resistive losses in the wire
would be huge (low Z = high IR losses)
I'm running some more models.
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|