>Message: 7
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:11:40 -0500
>From: "Wolfert, William R." <WWolfert@columbuspolice.org>
>Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 35, Issue 6
>To: "'towertalk@contesting.com'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Message-ID:
> <66D81EF8D306604BACDEBF5C757AD8196E4240@police10.columbuspolice.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Dudley
(...)
>If your usage of this term is of a scientific
>genre (as it seems in your reply to me) then my ignorance is evident. For
>that I apologize. I was not supporting the CFA theory.
>
>Fraternally,
>
>Bill - WR8K
Bill,
Thanks for your kind response. Yes, it's the fringe science of antennas
that interests me. There is enough controversy in that other area that we
certainly don't need to bring in something off topic. That one is
guaranteed to produce a firestorm.
But now that leaves me in an embarrassing position. Am I the only one to
admit to having built a CFA? Surely someone else on this list was intrigued
enough to get out the aluminum flashing and coffee cans? C'mon now. Fess
up!
Dudley - WA1X
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|