Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole

To: "'David Jordan'" <wa3gin@erols.com>,"'Jim Lux'" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole
From: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:12:22 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> ...I use 2" irrigation tubing for a dipole on 40 meters.  The 
> dipole has a usable bandwidth of about .5Mhz

I suspect the 2" tubing is to minimize droop on 40 meters rather than VSWR
across the band. Last I heard we only were allowed to use 300 kHz.
 
Tod, K0TO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Jordan
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: Jim Lux
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com; Jim Miller
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> ...I use a cage 1/4 wave vertical on 40 meters.  Using two 
> hulla hoops and 12 wires.  The vertical has a usable 
> bandwidth of about 1.5Mhz.
> ...I use 2" irrigation tubing for a dipole on 40 meters.  The 
> dipole has a usable bandwidth of about .5Mhz> 
> 73,
> dave
> wa3gin
> 
> Jim Lux wrote:
> 
> >At 08:57 AM 1/30/2006, Jim Miller wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Speaking of broadbanding and the possibility/probability of 
> increased 
> >>loss as the actual cause, does this apply to the dipole cut to a 
> >>specific band and then running several wires in a box (for 
> instance) 
> >>configuration separated by a foot or so with spreaders at 
> the ends and 
> >>all driven and connected together on each end?
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>