Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration

To: "Doug Rehman" <rehman@surveil.com>,"'TowerTalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:14:40 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jeez - the gadget costs more than two harnesses!  When you think that every 
seat belt in your car has the same sort of reel mechanism, which is rated for 
considerably higher G loads, you really have to wonder how much of the price is 
their liability insurance premium, and how much is profiteering.

73, Pete N4ZR



At 03:59 PM 6/14/2006, Doug Rehman wrote:
>> Those reels are very nice and give the worker plenty of 
>> mobility.  However, I understand they are more costly than a 
>> simple sewn fall arrest lanyard, and I don't see the need for 
>> one in my tower work.
>> 
>> 73, Keith NM5G
>
>For examples of what is being discussed, see:
>http://www.midwestunlimited.com/gallery.lasso?cat_master=1002&cat_level=1048
>
>The reels would work well for non-climbing applications, or perhaps once
>you've reached "altitude", but I would think they would be cumbersome to
>climb with- especially if obeying 100% fall arrest tie off.
>
>The obvious benefit of the reels is limited fall distance (9"-12" versus up
>to 6' with a conventional fall arrest lanyard.
>
>Doug
>K4DDR
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>