To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Strike |
From: | "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net> |
Date: | Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:47:36 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
<snip>
My question - Is it possible to have a direct lightning strike on a tower and yet show no visible or hidden signs on the tower and/or appendage(s) or show no 'secondary' signs in the immediate area surrounding the tower? Sure. Although the antenna on the old tower certainly displayed evidence of being hit as did all the coax fittings on top there was no sign of damage to the tower. No burn marks, nothing. You'd never know the tower had been hit. The_current_system shows no signs of being hit on antennas or tower, or any secondary damage, but it has been hit many times and that has been verified visually. A number of hits the first 3 years left no visual marks. I am in the process of lowering the system for maintenance so in a few days I should know if there are any marks, or damage from a very active last two years. As I've said before, the grounding for this system has over 600 feet of bare #2 cad welded to 32 - 33 eight foot ground rods.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Strike, JC Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Strike, Doug Renwick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Strike, JC Smith |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Strike, Gary Schafer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |