> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> gdaught6@stanford.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:01 PM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] R7000--vendor support
>
> On 13 Sep 2006 at 19:53, W4ZW wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
> > I also like the R-7 family of 3/8 WL verticals.
> Lightweight, easily
> > packed for travel, quick to put up, and quite effective. For our
> > Shark's Tooth festival in Venice, FL, we had one of my R-7's and a
> > Force 12 Sigma 5 both mounted on posts in the ground and
> it took the guys about 10 seconds to
> > abandon the Force 12 for the R-7.
>
> And this was because...?
>
> 73,
>
> George T. Daughters, K6GT
I thought the answer was obvious. The R-7 was substantially a better
performer on the bands we used, 20M and 15M. Both transmit and receive on
A/B tests.
Jon Hamlet, W4ZW
Casey Key Island, Florida
"A little piece of paradise in the Gulf of Mexico"
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|