Steve,
> Umm, this is TowerTalk - not ReceiverTalk. There are other more
> appropriate >places for this discussion to take place. OTOH if you want to
> talk about tower >and HF antenna construction questions, TT is definitely
> the place. Tnx.
>Cheers, Steve K7LXC
Your right; realized I was on the wrong reflector after I sent the post.
My apologies.
Tony KT2Q
-- Original Message -----
From: K7LXC@aol.com
To: dxdx@optonline.net
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 5:43 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept
In a message dated 1/25/2007 8:43:56 P.M. Central America Standard T,
towertalk-request@contesting.com writes:
> Have a question about third order intercept point. I understand the
measurement takes sensitivity into account at the point were IMD products
start to show at the noise floor; the greater the sensitivity is before
distortion shows up the better.
> If that's the case, then a good TOI figure alone doesn't tell the whole
story. If the sensitivity isn't in the useable range for most HF work (-110
~ 130dbm or so) then the receiver will have good IMD rejection, but would be
somewhat deaf compared to one with greater sensitivity.
> It would be similar to adding attenuation to improve the TOI by making
> the
rig less sensitive; a 10db attenuator might cause the TOI improve by 10db.
Would this be an accurate interpretation of the TOI measurement?
Umm, this is TowerTalk - not ReceiverTalk. There are other more
appropriate places for this discussion to take place. OTOH if you want to
talk about tower and HF antenna construction questions, TT is definitely the
place. Tnx.
Cheers,
Steve K7LXC
TT ADMIN
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|