Well, this ordinance is just like all the rest: you can do what you
want until somebody complains. I'm sure nobody will complain about a
dipole tied to a tree, but a SteppIR on top of a 70ft. tree in Gilroy
would almost certainly earn you a visit from Code Enforcement :-)
On 2/12/07, AA6DX - Mark <aa6dx@arrl.net> wrote:
> No waaarrrsss in trees?
> Wow ... first I have heard of that one. Kinda makes you wonder, whatever
> happened that made the solons decide to enact that regulation? Musta been
> some kind of "trigger"? Or are others on the list encumbered with that
> ridiculosity? 73
> Mark Nelson - AA6DX
>
> mailto: AA6DX@ARRL.NET
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 , other
>
>
> Trees are unregulated? Don't be so sure.
>
> The zoning ordinance for Gilroy, Ca. specifically forbids attaching
> antennas to trees or utility poles!!!!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|